CEA ELISA Kit (Carcinoembryonic Antigen)


Human CEA ELISA kit can be used for analysing in vitro quantitative amounts of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in human serum. This assay has a minimum sensitivity limit of < 0.596 ng/ml.


Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a glycoprotein which is 200 kD and is mainly involved in cell adhesion. It is normally only produced during fetal development within the gastrointestinal tissue and the production stop immediately before birth. It was first discovered in human colon cancer tissue extracts and it has been later identified that the level of this antigen also correlates with the tumor stage.

There have been a number of tumors which are now associated with elevated levels of CEA which include stomach, lung, colon, breast gullet and pancreatic carcinomas. Its measurement is predominately used as a tumor marker in order to monitor colorectal cancer treatment, staging, localise cancer spread and to identify recurrences.


All reagents supplied need to be stored at 2 °C – 8 °C, unopened reagents will retain reactivity until expiration date. Do not use reagents beyond this date.

  • Microtiterwells: Coated with anti-CEA antibody (monoclonal).
  • Zero Standard.
  • Standards (1-5): Concentrations 5, 10, 25, 50, 100 ng/mL.
  • Control Low & High (Lyophilized).
  • Enzyme Conjugate: Monoclonal anti-CEA antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase.
  • Substrate Solution: Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB).
  • Stop Solution: Contains 0.5 M H2SO4.
  • Wash Solution (40x Concentrated).


The minimum detection sensitivity level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) using current CEA ELISA kit was < 0.596 ng/ml. The dynamic range for this assay is 3.0 – 100.0 ng/ml.


– Assay Dynamic Range: 0.596 – 100 ng/mL
– Specificity of Antibodies (Cross Reactivity): Cross-reactivities are not known.
– Analytical Sensitivity: < 0.596 ng/mL
– Intra-Assay Variations: 3.2 – 4.9%
– Inter-Assay Variations: 5.6 – 6.3%
– Recovery: 85.8 – 107.0%
– Linearity: 89.9 – 114.6%
– High-Dose-Hook Effect: No hook effect was observed up to 8,000 ng/mL of CEA.
– Interfering Substances: Haemolytic, icteric and lipemic sera should be avoided.
– Drug Interference: Smokers have been reported to exhibit increased levels of CEA.


  1. CEA – a predictor for pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. (2013) 56 (7): 859-68. Wallin U., et al.
  2. Carcinoembryonic-antigen (CEA) as tumor marker in lung cancer. Lung Cancer. (2012) 76 (2): 138-43. Review. Grunnet M. and Sorensen J.B.
  3. Postsurgical surveillance for recurrence of UICC stage I colorectal carcinoma: is follow-up by CEA justified? Hepatogastroenterology. (2005) 52 (62): 444-9. Yamamoto S., et al.
  4. The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) family: structures, suggested functions and expression in normal and malignant tissues. Semin Cancer Biol. (1999) 9 (2): 67-81. Review. Hammarström S.


  • Full Name: CEA ELISA Kit (Carcinoembryonic Antigen)
  • Reactivity: Human
  • Sample Type: Serum
  • Sensitivity: 0.596 ng/ml


Online Enquiry Form

"*" indicates required fields

Please check mark information required:


Your secretory IgA ELISA gave good results and I was also really impressed with how quickly we received it.

L. Johnston
PhD Student / University of Glasgow

It is refreshing to know that you have a technical team that is very knowledgeable. I have already recommended your company to other researchers in our department.

Dr. P. Anderson
Lecturer / University College London (UCL)

I am a first time user and found that your instruction manual was very easy to follow. The insulin ELISA assay performed well and I was happy with the results that were generated.

J. Thomas
Senior Technician / Addenbrooke’s Hospital

I carried out a pilot study comparing the performance of many ELISA assay's from different suppliers and found your kits to be one of the better performers. We observed good linearity and tight replicates.

Dr. C. Davies
Lead Scientists / AstraZeneca

You are my first point of contact when I am looking to purchase ELISA. You have such an easy and simple system, yet it is very effective.

A. Shaw
Purchasing / University of Oxford